<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Goodies &#8211; Tower of London	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://visualmutterings.com/the-goodies-tower-of-london/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://visualmutterings.com/the-goodies-tower-of-london</link>
	<description>Archive television thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2023 12:53:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: chocsal		</title>
		<link>https://visualmutterings.com/the-goodies-tower-of-london#comment-28754</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chocsal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2023 12:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-28754</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Glad you enjoyed it. You can now get a box set of every episode on DVD (barring the original version of Kitten Kong). Hope you can get this, after which I look forward to reading more of your impressions of the series. Bill&#039;s musical collaborator at this stage was Mike Gibbs, btw. 

The visual puzzle element of the old lady is something that I hope simply signifies &#039;chew&#039; - but I admit could be read differently. I can never work out if the ambiguity was something intended as a bit of satire - I mean, along the lines of: &#039;If you were thinking of a different word then YOU are prejudiced - or if it had started out as a straight intention to use a stereotype which they later regretted and changed in the script. I sincerely hope it was the former. I&#039;m not brave enough to ask Graeme!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you enjoyed it. You can now get a box set of every episode on DVD (barring the original version of Kitten Kong). Hope you can get this, after which I look forward to reading more of your impressions of the series. Bill&#8217;s musical collaborator at this stage was Mike Gibbs, btw. </p>
<p>The visual puzzle element of the old lady is something that I hope simply signifies &#8216;chew&#8217; &#8211; but I admit could be read differently. I can never work out if the ambiguity was something intended as a bit of satire &#8211; I mean, along the lines of: &#8216;If you were thinking of a different word then YOU are prejudiced &#8211; or if it had started out as a straight intention to use a stereotype which they later regretted and changed in the script. I sincerely hope it was the former. I&#8217;m not brave enough to ask Graeme!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Barbara Elaine Kirk		</title>
		<link>https://visualmutterings.com/the-goodies-tower-of-london#comment-24029</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barbara Elaine Kirk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2022 19:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-24029</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s TV repeated some of the BBC series.  I didn&#039;t remember seeing the Tower Of London episode first time around as at the time, we still had a black and white telly that didn&#039;t receive BBC-2, and The Goodies was first shown on that channel.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s TV repeated some of the BBC series.  I didn&#8217;t remember seeing the Tower Of London episode first time around as at the time, we still had a black and white telly that didn&#8217;t receive BBC-2, and The Goodies was first shown on that channel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: H E Cooper		</title>
		<link>https://visualmutterings.com/the-goodies-tower-of-london#comment-9</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[H E Cooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2020 12:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It will be interesting to see how this episode stands for me when I&#039;ve seen more. I did like the falling-off-the-bike gag - it caught me as, knowing the bike was associated with the series, I did just expect them to head off smoothly!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see how this episode stands for me when I&#39;ve seen more. I did like the falling-off-the-bike gag &#8211; it caught me as, knowing the bike was associated with the series, I did just expect them to head off smoothly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://visualmutterings.com/the-goodies-tower-of-london#comment-12</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2020 11:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-12</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Goodies have their duff moments but are generally brilliant.  There is always some brilliant visual &#039;action&#039; comedy as well as sight gags, funny lines and a few groaners.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The actual story part of The Beefeaters has never been a favourite of mine, but I love all the set up.  Bill putting adverts in the Beano and Rubber Monthly.  The lady downstairs taking messages - &#039;Dear Giddies&#039; (&#034;Can&#039;t she talk?&#034; &#034;She can&#039;t even write!&#034;), the going-to-the-car gag, the falling-off-the-bike gag... Just magic!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Goodies have their duff moments but are generally brilliant.  There is always some brilliant visual &#39;action&#39; comedy as well as sight gags, funny lines and a few groaners.</p>
<p>The actual story part of The Beefeaters has never been a favourite of mine, but I love all the set up.  Bill putting adverts in the Beano and Rubber Monthly.  The lady downstairs taking messages &#8211; &#39;Dear Giddies&#39; (&quot;Can&#39;t she talk?&quot; &quot;She can&#39;t even write!&quot;), the going-to-the-car gag, the falling-off-the-bike gag&#8230; Just magic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
